diff --git a/Scripts/create_tables.R b/Scripts/create_tables.R
index b3d8e6acfcce8e43b77c13c64fb668fbf8b5ba26..e0495449cc6e563c282f42f21377c76c399f7254 100644
--- a/Scripts/create_tables.R
+++ b/Scripts/create_tables.R
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ texreg(c(case_B_cols_NR[1], remGOF(case_B_cols_NR[2:6])),
        custom.model.names = c("Mean", "SD", "Treated", "Vol. Treated", "No Info", "NR-Index"), custom.note = "%stars (one-sided). Robust standard errors in parentheses.",
        stars = c(0.01, 0.05, 0.1), float.pos="tb",
        label = "tab:mxl_C_NR",
-       caption = "Results of mixed logit model with treatment interactions for Case B.",
+       caption = "Results of mixed logit model with treatment interactions for Case B including NR-index.",
        file="Tables/mxl/case_B_rent_INT_NR.tex")
 
 
diff --git a/Scripts/interaction_plots_presi.R b/Scripts/interaction_plots_presi.R
index 0e3727323e8bae7cdc2e80309169d818cb2fdc8d..6ebd0ad5704cf1864cbd39522295ec6020db842d 100644
--- a/Scripts/interaction_plots_presi.R
+++ b/Scripts/interaction_plots_presi.R
@@ -35,20 +35,20 @@ case_D_labels <- c("No Info", "Treated", "Vol. Treated")
 case_D_labels_re <- c("Treated", "Vol. Treated", "No Info")
 
 plot_interview_A <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_spent_control_A, case_A_labels, case_A_labels,
-                                                 "Interview Time in Seconds", -380, 380)
+                                                 "Interview Time in Seconds", -150, 150)
 plot_interview_C <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_spent_control_C, case_C_labels, case_C_labels_re,
-                                                 "Interview Time in Seconds", -380, 380)
+                                                 "Interview Time in Seconds", -150, 150)
 
 plot_interview_D <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_spent_control_D, case_D_labels, case_D_labels_re,
-                                                 "Interview Time in Seconds", -380, 380)
+                                                 "Interview Time in Seconds", -150, 150)
 
 plot_cc_A <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_cc_control_A, case_A_labels, case_A_labels,
-                                          "Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -5, 5)
+                                          "Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -3, 3)
 plot_cc_C <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_cc_control_C, case_C_labels, case_C_labels_re,
-                                          "Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -5, 5)
+                                          "Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -3, 3)
 
 plot_cc_D <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_cc_control_D, case_D_labels, case_D_labels_re,
-                                          "Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -5, 5)
+                                          "Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -3, 3)
 
 plot_mani_A <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_percentage_correct_control_A, case_A_labels, case_A_labels,
                                             "Percentage of Correct Quiz Statements", -15, 15)
diff --git a/project_start.qmd b/project_start.qmd
index 287eeacf73b7a832561d306de232e910d3190d0d..cc3a6a47e829439108575683581956d2b4480b60 100644
--- a/project_start.qmd
+++ b/project_start.qmd
@@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ title-slide-attributes:
   data-background-size: contain
   data-background-opacity: "0.2"
 author: "Nino Cavallaro, Fabian Marder, Julian Sagebiel"
-institute: German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
+institute: 
+- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
+- Leipzig University 
 date: today
 date-format: long
 format: 
@@ -170,7 +172,7 @@ To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
     \label{simple_logit}
 \end{equation}
 ```
--   OLS regression (survey engagement,information recall, consequentiality, status quo choices):
+-   OLS regression (survey engagement, information recall, consequentiality):
 
 ```{=tex}
 \begin{equation}
@@ -313,6 +315,22 @@ ggpubr::ggarrange(plot_mani_D, plot_cons_D)
 
 ## MXL: Case B
 
+::: {style="font-size: 60%;"}
+```{r, results='asis'}
+htmlreg(c(case_B_cols[1], remGOF(case_B_cols[2:5])),
+       custom.coef.map = list("natural" = "Naturalness", "walking" = "Walking Distance", "rent" = "Rent",
+                              "ASC_sq" = "ASC SQ", "_natural" = "Naturalness", "nat" = "Naturalness",
+                              "wd" = "Walking Distance", "asc" = "ASC SQ",
+                              "ASC_sq_info" = "ASC SQ", "rent_info" = "Rent", "nat_info" = "Naturalness", "walking_info" = "Walking Distance"),
+       custom.model.names = c("Mean", "SD", "Treated", "Vol. Treated", "No Info"), custom.note = "%stars (one-sided). Robust standard errors in parentheses.",
+       stars = c(0.01, 0.05, 0.1), float.pos="tb",
+       label = "tab:mxl_C",
+       caption = "Results of mixed logit model with treatment interactions for Case B including NR-index.")
+```
+:::
+
+## MXL: Case B with NR-index interaction
+
 ::: {style="font-size: 60%;"}
 ```{r, results='asis'}
 htmlreg(c(case_B_cols_NR[1], remGOF(case_B_cols_NR[2:6])),
@@ -327,8 +345,6 @@ htmlreg(c(case_B_cols_NR[1], remGOF(case_B_cols_NR[2:6])),
 ```
 :::
 
-
-
 ## Discussion (1)
 
 1. How do obligatory and optional information provision affect survey engagement, information recall, consequentiality, and stated preferences?