Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

Compare revisions

Changes are shown as if the source revision was being merged into the target revision. Learn more about comparing revisions.

Source

Select target project
No results found
Select Git revision
  • fix/typo
  • lfs
  • master
  • wip/project-management
4 results

Target

Select target project
  • sc/edu/git-seminar
  • mk21womu/git-seminar
2 results
Select Git revision
  • fixes-typo-19
  • fixes-typo-2025-03-27
  • fixes-typo-2025-04-14
  • fixes-typo-2025u
  • fixes-typo-8
  • fixes-typo-9
  • krausec-main-patch-16624
  • lfs
  • main
  • wip/config-paste
  • wip/project-management
11 results
Show changes
Commits on Source (1)
- immer tailored zu gruppe, eher nicht generell
## why git?
- product (doc, software, blah)
- progress on product
- be able to see (hi)story of changes
- be able to go back
- ?
- git is best tool for the job
## markdown crash course
- highlighting
- listen
- bilder
- hilfe
Project Management
==================
## Group/Project Structure
- base this on organizational structure / teams!
- **because notifications** (emails)
- these are your triggers to consume/act/participate!
- e.g. HR has **watch** (all) notifications for **bo/hr**, but others only
**participate**, i.e. when they are explicitly called upon
- everyone in **bo** should have at least **mention** in **bo**
- use `/cc @user` to include someone in discussion
- **pro tip:** use **meta** project!
- **pro tip:** start with single project, split into sub-group tree **only** if
complexity increases
(show tree graph to highlight)
## Issue
- aka task aka todo
- kommentare
- notifications!
- netiquette
- mention, assignee
- milestone, roadmap, (epics)
## labels
- efficient use of labels
- kinds of labels
- blocked, **discuss**, consulting, coop, strategy
- duplicate, triage, wontfix
- bug, consolidation, doc
- will recognize them naturally
- just start if you see some categories
- ask to consult at 42 open issues (when you lose overview)
- don't overuse overindulge yourself
- don't label if milestone
- don't label if subgroup or subproject
## documentation
- write in markdown
- decide on either
- wiki
- plain markdown with products published in runner
## use case: meeting protocols
- not needed if **discuss** issues are used
- make everything **actionable**
- don't create issues for meetings/protocols
- if protocol is needed for externals, use wiki and/or protocol project with
runner, or etherpad