Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 7702d841 authored by nc71qaxa's avatar nc71qaxa
Browse files

presi finetune

parent 58ef2a66
Branches
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ texreg(c(case_B_cols_NR[1], remGOF(case_B_cols_NR[2:6])),
custom.model.names = c("Mean", "SD", "Treated", "Vol. Treated", "No Info", "NR-Index"), custom.note = "%stars (one-sided). Robust standard errors in parentheses.",
stars = c(0.01, 0.05, 0.1), float.pos="tb",
label = "tab:mxl_C_NR",
caption = "Results of mixed logit model with treatment interactions for Case B.",
caption = "Results of mixed logit model with treatment interactions for Case B including NR-index.",
file="Tables/mxl/case_B_rent_INT_NR.tex")
......
......@@ -35,20 +35,20 @@ case_D_labels <- c("No Info", "Treated", "Vol. Treated")
case_D_labels_re <- c("Treated", "Vol. Treated", "No Info")
plot_interview_A <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_spent_control_A, case_A_labels, case_A_labels,
"Interview Time in Seconds", -380, 380)
"Interview Time in Seconds", -150, 150)
plot_interview_C <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_spent_control_C, case_C_labels, case_C_labels_re,
"Interview Time in Seconds", -380, 380)
"Interview Time in Seconds", -150, 150)
plot_interview_D <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_spent_control_D, case_D_labels, case_D_labels_re,
"Interview Time in Seconds", -380, 380)
"Interview Time in Seconds", -150, 150)
plot_cc_A <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_cc_control_A, case_A_labels, case_A_labels,
"Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -5, 5)
"Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -3, 3)
plot_cc_C <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_cc_control_C, case_C_labels, case_C_labels_re,
"Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -5, 5)
"Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -3, 3)
plot_cc_D <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_cc_control_D, case_D_labels, case_D_labels_re,
"Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -5, 5)
"Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -3, 3)
plot_mani_A <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_percentage_correct_control_A, case_A_labels, case_A_labels,
"Percentage of Correct Quiz Statements", -15, 15)
......
......@@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ title-slide-attributes:
data-background-size: contain
data-background-opacity: "0.2"
author: "Nino Cavallaro, Fabian Marder, Julian Sagebiel"
institute: German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
institute:
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
- Leipzig University
date: today
date-format: long
format:
......@@ -170,7 +172,7 @@ To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
\label{simple_logit}
\end{equation}
```
- OLS regression (survey engagement,information recall, consequentiality, status quo choices):
- OLS regression (survey engagement, information recall, consequentiality):
```{=tex}
\begin{equation}
......@@ -313,6 +315,22 @@ ggpubr::ggarrange(plot_mani_D, plot_cons_D)
## MXL: Case B
::: {style="font-size: 60%;"}
```{r, results='asis'}
htmlreg(c(case_B_cols[1], remGOF(case_B_cols[2:5])),
custom.coef.map = list("natural" = "Naturalness", "walking" = "Walking Distance", "rent" = "Rent",
"ASC_sq" = "ASC SQ", "_natural" = "Naturalness", "nat" = "Naturalness",
"wd" = "Walking Distance", "asc" = "ASC SQ",
"ASC_sq_info" = "ASC SQ", "rent_info" = "Rent", "nat_info" = "Naturalness", "walking_info" = "Walking Distance"),
custom.model.names = c("Mean", "SD", "Treated", "Vol. Treated", "No Info"), custom.note = "%stars (one-sided). Robust standard errors in parentheses.",
stars = c(0.01, 0.05, 0.1), float.pos="tb",
label = "tab:mxl_C",
caption = "Results of mixed logit model with treatment interactions for Case B including NR-index.")
```
:::
## MXL: Case B with NR-index interaction
::: {style="font-size: 60%;"}
```{r, results='asis'}
htmlreg(c(case_B_cols_NR[1], remGOF(case_B_cols_NR[2:6])),
......@@ -327,8 +345,6 @@ htmlreg(c(case_B_cols_NR[1], remGOF(case_B_cols_NR[2:6])),
```
:::
## Discussion (1)
1. How do obligatory and optional information provision affect survey engagement, information recall, consequentiality, and stated preferences?
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment