Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 7702d841 authored by nc71qaxa's avatar nc71qaxa
Browse files

presi finetune

parent 58ef2a66
Branches
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ texreg(c(case_B_cols_NR[1], remGOF(case_B_cols_NR[2:6])), ...@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ texreg(c(case_B_cols_NR[1], remGOF(case_B_cols_NR[2:6])),
custom.model.names = c("Mean", "SD", "Treated", "Vol. Treated", "No Info", "NR-Index"), custom.note = "%stars (one-sided). Robust standard errors in parentheses.", custom.model.names = c("Mean", "SD", "Treated", "Vol. Treated", "No Info", "NR-Index"), custom.note = "%stars (one-sided). Robust standard errors in parentheses.",
stars = c(0.01, 0.05, 0.1), float.pos="tb", stars = c(0.01, 0.05, 0.1), float.pos="tb",
label = "tab:mxl_C_NR", label = "tab:mxl_C_NR",
caption = "Results of mixed logit model with treatment interactions for Case B.", caption = "Results of mixed logit model with treatment interactions for Case B including NR-index.",
file="Tables/mxl/case_B_rent_INT_NR.tex") file="Tables/mxl/case_B_rent_INT_NR.tex")
......
...@@ -35,20 +35,20 @@ case_D_labels <- c("No Info", "Treated", "Vol. Treated") ...@@ -35,20 +35,20 @@ case_D_labels <- c("No Info", "Treated", "Vol. Treated")
case_D_labels_re <- c("Treated", "Vol. Treated", "No Info") case_D_labels_re <- c("Treated", "Vol. Treated", "No Info")
plot_interview_A <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_spent_control_A, case_A_labels, case_A_labels, plot_interview_A <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_spent_control_A, case_A_labels, case_A_labels,
"Interview Time in Seconds", -380, 380) "Interview Time in Seconds", -150, 150)
plot_interview_C <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_spent_control_C, case_C_labels, case_C_labels_re, plot_interview_C <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_spent_control_C, case_C_labels, case_C_labels_re,
"Interview Time in Seconds", -380, 380) "Interview Time in Seconds", -150, 150)
plot_interview_D <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_spent_control_D, case_D_labels, case_D_labels_re, plot_interview_D <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_spent_control_D, case_D_labels, case_D_labels_re,
"Interview Time in Seconds", -380, 380) "Interview Time in Seconds", -150, 150)
plot_cc_A <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_cc_control_A, case_A_labels, case_A_labels, plot_cc_A <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_cc_control_A, case_A_labels, case_A_labels,
"Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -5, 5) "Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -3, 3)
plot_cc_C <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_cc_control_C, case_C_labels, case_C_labels_re, plot_cc_C <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_cc_control_C, case_C_labels, case_C_labels_re,
"Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -5, 5) "Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -3, 3)
plot_cc_D <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_cc_control_D, case_D_labels, case_D_labels_re, plot_cc_D <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_time_cc_control_D, case_D_labels, case_D_labels_re,
"Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -5, 5) "Mean Choice Card Time in Seconds", -3, 3)
plot_mani_A <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_percentage_correct_control_A, case_A_labels, case_A_labels, plot_mani_A <- create_interaction_term_plot(ols_percentage_correct_control_A, case_A_labels, case_A_labels,
"Percentage of Correct Quiz Statements", -15, 15) "Percentage of Correct Quiz Statements", -15, 15)
......
...@@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ title-slide-attributes: ...@@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ title-slide-attributes:
data-background-size: contain data-background-size: contain
data-background-opacity: "0.2" data-background-opacity: "0.2"
author: "Nino Cavallaro, Fabian Marder, Julian Sagebiel" author: "Nino Cavallaro, Fabian Marder, Julian Sagebiel"
institute: German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig institute:
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
- Leipzig University
date: today date: today
date-format: long date-format: long
format: format:
...@@ -170,7 +172,7 @@ To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? ...@@ -170,7 +172,7 @@ To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
\label{simple_logit} \label{simple_logit}
\end{equation} \end{equation}
``` ```
- OLS regression (survey engagement,information recall, consequentiality, status quo choices): - OLS regression (survey engagement, information recall, consequentiality):
```{=tex} ```{=tex}
\begin{equation} \begin{equation}
...@@ -313,6 +315,22 @@ ggpubr::ggarrange(plot_mani_D, plot_cons_D) ...@@ -313,6 +315,22 @@ ggpubr::ggarrange(plot_mani_D, plot_cons_D)
## MXL: Case B ## MXL: Case B
::: {style="font-size: 60%;"}
```{r, results='asis'}
htmlreg(c(case_B_cols[1], remGOF(case_B_cols[2:5])),
custom.coef.map = list("natural" = "Naturalness", "walking" = "Walking Distance", "rent" = "Rent",
"ASC_sq" = "ASC SQ", "_natural" = "Naturalness", "nat" = "Naturalness",
"wd" = "Walking Distance", "asc" = "ASC SQ",
"ASC_sq_info" = "ASC SQ", "rent_info" = "Rent", "nat_info" = "Naturalness", "walking_info" = "Walking Distance"),
custom.model.names = c("Mean", "SD", "Treated", "Vol. Treated", "No Info"), custom.note = "%stars (one-sided). Robust standard errors in parentheses.",
stars = c(0.01, 0.05, 0.1), float.pos="tb",
label = "tab:mxl_C",
caption = "Results of mixed logit model with treatment interactions for Case B including NR-index.")
```
:::
## MXL: Case B with NR-index interaction
::: {style="font-size: 60%;"} ::: {style="font-size: 60%;"}
```{r, results='asis'} ```{r, results='asis'}
htmlreg(c(case_B_cols_NR[1], remGOF(case_B_cols_NR[2:6])), htmlreg(c(case_B_cols_NR[1], remGOF(case_B_cols_NR[2:6])),
...@@ -327,8 +345,6 @@ htmlreg(c(case_B_cols_NR[1], remGOF(case_B_cols_NR[2:6])), ...@@ -327,8 +345,6 @@ htmlreg(c(case_B_cols_NR[1], remGOF(case_B_cols_NR[2:6])),
``` ```
::: :::
## Discussion (1) ## Discussion (1)
1. How do obligatory and optional information provision affect survey engagement, information recall, consequentiality, and stated preferences? 1. How do obligatory and optional information provision affect survey engagement, information recall, consequentiality, and stated preferences?
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment